Archives

or

  • Does the Insurer have a Duty to Defend the Insured Based on the Policy’s Coverage?

    June 15, 2017 – Wal-Mart Canada Corp. v. Intact Insurance Company, 2016 ONSC 4971 In this case, Wal-Mart Canada Corp. (“Wal-Mart”) sought a declaration for defence and indemnification under a policy of insurance its maintenance subcontractor had with Intact Insurance Company (“Intact”). Walmart was a named insured under that policy. Read more
    Read More
  • Innocent Co-Insured Entitled to Recover

    June 15, 2017 – The insured added her boyfriend to her insurance policy believing his Nova Scotia identification card was his driver’s licence. In fact, his driver’s licence had been suspended. 8 days after he was added to the policy he was involved in a collision. The issue before the Court was whether the innocent co-insured could recover under...
    Read More
  • Blaneys argues Ontario Court of Appeal Excluded Driver Endorsement case

    June 15, 2017 – In RSA v Intact Insurance, Ms. Wilson and her husband met with their insurance broker on February 29, 2012. Her license had been suspended on account of unpaid fines. In order to maintain coverage on her Impala she had to purchase coverage from different insurance carrier. She decided to purchase a policy from Intact that insured the...
    Read More
  • Blaneys Wins Appeal on the Duty to Defend Allegations of Fraud

    June 15, 2017 – In July 2012 someone stole 494,050 pounds of nickel from Vale Canada in Manitoba. In 2013 Vale sued those parties it thought responsible, including one of its subcontractors and a company named Urbanmine Inc., which is involved in the metal industry in Manitoba. The statement of claim alleged the defendants were liable for damages of...
    Read More

Do not miss the latest developments in Canadian insurance law

Subscribe