-
SVR Lawyers, Alberta, August 30, 2012 – In Benc v. Parker, 2012 ABCA 249, David Pick, on behalf of the appellant, appeared before the Court of Appeal in a matter that involves the scheduling of a Certified Examination (“CE”), and specifically what happens if the plaintiff or plaintiff’s counsel do not feel that the appointed examiner has made reasonable efforts to schedule...
-
McKercher LLP, Saskatchewan, August 29, 2012 – The appellants argued the certification judge erred in determining a class action would be the preferable procedure in light of the number of individual issues that remain outstanding. The Court found it is not unusual to have a class action where liability turns on a determination of the common issues, but where individual damages may...
-
Stein Monast, Quebec, August 06, 2012 – John Deere Limited v. Promutuel Lac St-Pierre – Les Forges, S.C. Richelieu, 765-17-000982-100, July 17, 2012, L. Lacoursière For the first time, the Superior Court has clarified the status of a creditor under a non-automobile insurance policy, in this instance an agricultural policy. John Deere was named as the creditor on Promutuel’s policy. John Deere...
-
Stein Monast, Quebec, July 31, 2012 – SSQ, société d’assurances générales inc. v. Alain Crytes, (C.Q., Maniwaki, No. 565-22-000081-089), 2012 march, 12, Fournier J. In the context of an action seeking sanctions for misrepresentation, the Court of Quebec has recognized that statements made by the insured during a polygraph test can be used as evidence. On March 21, 2012, Judge Fournier ruled,...